Is your portfolio actually ready to monetize?

Each of the seven dimensions is rated on a four-level maturity ladder — Nascent, Developing, Established, Advanced — a structure adapted from capability-maturity models and PPP enabling-environment indices. Levels carry 0–3 points; the total is normalised to a 0–100 index and mapped to four readiness tiers (0–39, 40–64, 65–84, 85–100).

On equal weighting. Dimensions are weighted equally by design. This keeps the diagnostic transparent and directional; it deliberately avoids the false precision of a weighted model, which in a live transaction would be tailored to the asset class, market, and deal structure. Read the score as a conversation-opener, not a valuation.

On gating dimensions. Some dimensions act as gates, not contributors. An asset with contested legal title, or a programme with no enabling legislation, is not investable at any headline score. Where a foundational dimension sits at Nascent, address it first regardless of the total — the "priority moves" surface exactly these.

Scope note: this tool assesses readiness to transact. Whether a monetization adds to public debt is a separate question of structure and statistical classification (IMF GFSM / Eurostat ESA 2010) and should be assessed independently — a control-retaining monetization can be reclassified as borrowing.

• World Bank Group — PPP Reference Guide, Version 3 (2017). The standard reference on PPP frameworks, project preparation, and risk allocation, developed with the multilateral development banks and OECD.
• World Bank — Benchmarking Infrastructure Development (2023). Cross-country benchmarks for the quality of PPP preparation, procurement, and contract management (formerly Procuring Infrastructure PPPs).
• GI Hub — PPP Risk Allocation Tool (2019). Reference matrices for allocating each risk to the party best able to manage it; GI Hub now sits within the World Bank's PPIAF.
• OECD — Principles for Public Governance of PPPs (2012). Governance standards: institutional capacity, value for money, transparency, and budgeting for contingent liabilities.
• Economist Impact — Infrascope (IDB-commissioned). A benchmark methodology for the PPP enabling environment across regulatory, institutional, financial, and operational readiness; current editions cover Latin America & the Caribbean.
• IMF GFSM 2014 & Eurostat ESA 2010 / EPEC PPP Guide (2016). Statistical rules — and the Eurostat/EPEC guide applying them to PPPs — determining whether a deal sits on- or off-balance-sheet and whether proceeds score as disposal or debt.
• Australia — National Partnership on Asset Recycling (2014). The Commonwealth incentive scheme, with New South Wales as the flagship state case — recycling as monetization plus rule-based redeployment of proceeds.
• Credit enhancement — MIGA, GuarantCo, InfraCredit. Guarantee and first-loss instruments — World Bank Group political-risk/credit guarantees, PIDG local-currency guarantees, and Nigeria's infrastructure credit guarantor — that lift marginal assets to bankability.

Primary sources verified July 2026 against their official publishers; several are updated periodically, so confirm the current edition before republishing. These are indicative anchors, not endorsements — adapt the framework to your jurisdiction's PPP law, procurement regime, and asset class.